32 or 64??
anubis
darthanubis at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 07:30:02 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> anubis wrote:
>> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html
>
> "This is a prerelease version of the Adobe® Flash® Player 10 software 64-bit
> Linux platforms."
>
> Helps to read the pages you cite.
snip
I read what the page said. Figured you could as well. That pre-released
plugin works alot better than the 32bit hack that is begin used on 64bit
systems, since it is native.
In your effort to be clever you have failed to be informative or useful.
The salient point, is that there is nothing unsafe about running
natively 64bit. Regardless how much fear you pump.
Just admit YOU are too afraid to do so, and therefore are in no position
to advise anyone else on the matter. That would be a respectable
position. I gave the user links, noticed you snipped the PPA which
allows the 64bit plugin to build on the users machine, which allow
her/him to make a choice. They can choose fear, and run a hack job, or
knowledge and have a stable fast system.
I can comment from both standpoint as I doubt you know what running 100%
bit is about. Speak only of what you know, please.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAktlMXoACgkQBUKBOaqK6Y/+XQCgxCKaA7hRWHILYHMiwXcbpRE3
UgAAn1tfCZ6w5uoglQJYr1UkLJ7eXyKg
=ESw/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list