New moderation technique, rewritten

[Basil Chupin]

On 14/06/10 07:08, Res wrote:


Firstly, do not top post in this mail list. OK? The moderators can come 
down really hard on you about this.

With this in mind I am transferring your comments to the appropriate 
location at the bottom.....

<PRESTO!>

> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Basil Chupin wrote:
>
>> On 13/06/10 02:26, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Karl Larsen<klarsen1 at gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/12/2010 07:44 AM, Loïc Grenié wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 2010/6/12 Karl Larsen<klarsen1 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 05:21 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/06/10 22:56, Karl Larsen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>          Yesterday I broke the moderation rule. It appears to be:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>          moderation = number - x = 0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> where number is the number of messages YOU sent.
>>>>>>>> x is a moderation number selected by the moderator.
>>>>>>>> When number and x are equal, your not able to send any message 
>>>>>>>> to this list.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This list is unable to control the use of it. We get emails 
>>>>>>>> selling
>>>>>>>> things. This "fix" will not fix this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>          So I will again decide if I want to play games. 10.04 
>>>>>>>> is running
>>>>>>>> fine but there are still some things done better on 8.04. I was 
>>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>>> send in a bug report but that is so hard to do now I may not 
>>>>>>>> bother.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 73 Karl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>      Here it is in simple terms.
>>>>
>>>> 1. At about 06-10-2010 at about 4:00 PM in the Mountain Zone which is
>>>> 11:00 PM in England I tried to send a message to this list.
>>>>
>>>> 2. I am using Thunderbird version 3.0.4
>>>>
>>>> 3. When thunderbird tried to send the message it was slow.
>>>>
>>>> 4. After about 30 seconds it said it could not send message because it
>>>> was denied.
>>>>
>>>> 5. I wrote a small test message and it was denied.
>>>>
>>>> 6. I wrote to another list and it worked fine.
>>>>
>>>> 7. The problem was in the Ubuntu list only.
>>>>
>>> Your formula doesn't make any sense though because you made very few
>>> posts on the 10th and 11th.
>>>
>>
>> Ssshhhh.....don't spoil it...I'm still waiting for 73 Karl to give me
>> the name of that secret compound he ingests....
>>
>> BC


 >As much as it pains me to support Karl in any way, I must say, yet 
again it seems, the moderation on this list is a "boys club", Karl is 
all too often shutdown for speaking shit

Ouch! An unacceptable four-letter word!

(You should use "merde" - it's French and so, so much more acceptable 
you know....But then if you use such words as you have in this post then 
you wouldn't know that, would you?)


 >(often rightly so) and other of his OT related rants, however, >the 
one sidedness blinds us all, as the infamous self appointed net-cops and 
the usual suspect cry baby who sulks to the apparent moderators of this 
list about him, me, >and I think some others when things stray unrelated 
to the "user >technical support", but yet feel they can do what they 
want (yes, hello van gassen) and OT rant anytime they want and get away 
with it, and do in fact get away with it >now said cry baby concerned 
has not yet entered this threaed, >but, there
 >are alot of people here who in my opinoin are here to troll and stir shit


Isn't this a four-letter word considered to be foul language which you 
have already used above? Oooow.....The first time is an accident, the 
second time is.....hmmmm?


 >etc, and currently mocking Karl apparently free to do so by the rose 
coloured glasses wearing moderators.
 >
 >This is why I am most disliked here, because i believe rules apply to 
all and not just those not in your lil circle of mates, or those not in 
that circle.
 >
 >So to the apparent moderators, pull your finger out and apply the 
rules evenly, If you cant do your job properly, piss off


Once again, another four-letter word......Sigh...


 > and let others who will
 >do it, do it. Or, maybe I should staret complaining about you, I 
partitioned and made a lot of noise to get this list  official 
moderators to be rid of the self appointed net cops, but it seems the 
gooses put in that position are not able to >impartionally carry out
 >said duties.
 >
 >
 >Res (who hasnt ever yet been "moderated", but likely will be now LOL)


Consider yourself to be have been moderated - you very, very bad boy :-) .

BC

-- 
Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society.
                                            James Madison