Ubuntu 10.04 LTS released
Claudiu Vlad
claudiu.vlad at gmail.com
Sun May 2 17:00:34 UTC 2010
Never did a clean install since dapper drake. Don't remember which year it
was ?
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Ioannis Vranos
<cppdeveloper at ontelecoms.gr>wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 10:52 +0500, Faizan Kazi wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Pastor JW
> > <pastor_jw at the-inner-circle.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 April 2010 1:26:38 pm Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> > > Myself would go with a clean install (I prefer clean
> > installs than
> > > upgrades).
> >
> >
> > Clean installs are way too windoze for me, I want a distro
> > which can
> > flawlessly upgrade and update itself without having to delete
> > and reinstall
> > all the time.
> >
> > I completely agree! One of the most important bits is upgrading
> > flawlessly. Clean installs are Windows domain.
>
>
> While upgrading is nice in theory, the truth is that for every OS, clean
> install is the most tested procedure, and thus it leads to the fewest
> problems.
>
> So if there is not some data issue, I prefer to back up my data and
> perform a clean install.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ioannis Vranos
>
> C95 / C++03 Software Developer
>
> http://www.cpp-software.net
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20100502/77e0d6bf/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list