ubuntu-tweak

[Lucio M Nicolosi]

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Basil Chupin <blchupin at iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On 03/05/10 13:50, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 20:42:11 -0400
>> "Fred A. Miller"<fmiller at lightlink.com>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 05/02/2010 08:21 PM, Lucio M Nicolosi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Fred A.
>>>> Miller<fmiller at lightlink.com>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am interested to know why ubuntu-tweak isn't included IN the
>>>>> "base" 32-bit and 64-bit releases. It's a very worthwhile
>>>>> application for any user, but in particular for those new to
>>>>> Ubuntu.
>>>>>
>>>> I guess the reason is that most tweaks are already available in a
>>>> standard system, if you just care to look for them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Many are hidden, and newbies AREN'T going to find them easily.
>>> There's not a good reason not to include it that I can think of.
>>>
>>> Fred
>>>
>>>
>> Ubuntu wants to fit on a normal CD, not a DVD.  Therefore it is
>> necessary to miss out on some /good/ open programs in order to have Mono
>> and related apps.
>> Not to mention Ubuntu One which is alright (to fail to mention in this
>> context) since Ubuntu needs to make some money somewhere with this OS.
>>
>> Cybe R. Wizard
>>
> You could get rid of that useless piece of junk called PulseAudio which
> on its own takes up ~650Kb and put in the Tweak.
>
> I consider Tweak UI to be an essential feature to be installed by default.
>
> BC

Given the outstanding support, I have to admit I was probably wrong
when stated that Ubuntu-Tweaks (and not Gnome-Tweaks as  mistakenly
referred to) was less than an essential tool. My apologies to the list
and:

please donations to:

https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=shfL-PHQ0WzsbZrTqZTBOTmKy5Xu3RZtEfUA5Tg3E2qVo3lP9NFLrC2FZq8&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f059ee17e99acf19529de9a5cb8b345b6900ea9ca1a1bd814
-- 
L M Nicolosi, Eng.
Lat.:  23°34'4.79"S - Long.: 46°39'59.53"W
Linux Regist. User #481505 - http://counter.li.org/