grub sees 2 out of 3 systems...lucky me
Lucio M Nicolosi
lmnicolosi at gmail.com
Mon May 3 16:09:00 UTC 2010
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Dotan Cohen <dotancohen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 10.04 Lucid, although
>> just released, is running fine.
>
> I know of at least myself and four other users who cannot upgrade to
> Lucid because of this issue:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/537640
>
> Lucid is full of "little bugs", or "papercuts" in Ubuntu terms,
> usually with regard to cutting-edge software. I remember that 8.04.0
> suffered the same issues (and included a beta Firefox), so it seems
> that for the LTS releases they try to cram in as much future-looking
> software as possible even if that sacrifices stability on release day.
> I am hoping that 10.04.1 may address these issues.
>
> Don't forget, even if a particular distro is running fine for _you_,
> it does not make it a suitable distro for everyone.
>
> --
> Dotan Cohen
Completely agree, please were is written :
"although just released"
please understand:
"although just released before there was enough time to get rid of at
least the most critical of the more than 300 bugs that affect the
version but this is not quite news since it is the way Canonical
behaves"
and were is written:
"(it) is running fine"
Please understand:
"(it) is running fine, after a fresh install in my NVidia based
system, after reporting a couple of bugs to headquarters, some of
which were addressed, some not, (and I'm trying to live with them
because Ubuntu One behaves better than Karmic) and of course, since
this remark refers to just one machine it has no statistical
significance whatsoever."
But I though it was implicit. Me, lazy typist.
--
L M Nicolosi, Eng.
Lat.: 23°34'4.79"S - Long.: 46°39'59.53"W
Linux Regist. User #481505 - http://counter.li.org/
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list