gmail reply-to [was Nautilus]

[Colin Law]

On 22 April 2011 19:42, Ric Moore <wayward4now at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 18:22 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
>> On 22 April 2011 17:57, Cybe R. Wizard <cyber_wizard at mindspring.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:29:36 +0100
>> > Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 22 April 2011 17:27, Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On 22 April 2011 17:07, Jim Byrnes <jf_byrnes at comcast.net> wrote:
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> Most headers seem to have the group itself in the Reply To:. If
>> >> >> you can't change that maybe logging in to your Ubuntu account and
>> >> >> reviewing your subscription options may help.  At the very bottom
>> >> >> of the list is Avoid duplicate copies of messages?
>> >> >
>> >> > I have selected Yes for Avoid duplicate copies.  Can someone tell me
>> >> > if it has made a difference?  I cannot see for myself of course.
>> >>
>> >> I have also now set Receive your own posts to the list to No.  The
>> >> description of that sounds as if it may help.  Any difference in the
>> >> Reply-To?
>> >>
>> >> Colion
>> >>
>> > It still shows:
>> > Reply-To: clanlaw at googlemail.com, "Ubuntu user technical support,
>> >          not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
>> >
>> > I fear you may be butting heads with a google-shaped brick wall.
>>
>> I have a theory, how is this?
>
> That worked!
>                          Reply-to:
> "Ubuntu user technical support, not
> for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
>
> Congrats! What did you do?? Ric

In case anyone else has this problem, in gmail Settings > Accounts and
Import > Send Mail As, click Edit Info.  In there is the option to
provide what it says is a "different reply-to address".  Somehow I had
enabled that feature, but put my normal gmail address in there (so not
a "different" reply-to, just my normal one).  How that happened I have
no idea.  It appears that caused my mail to be sent with reply-to set
and I think mailman was interpreting the fact that I had supplied a
reply-to to indicate that this should be passed on to list members
along with the list address.  The solution was to clear the field for
reply-to.

Many thanks to all for helping sort this out and apologies to Chris
for falsely suggesting it was something to do with him.

Colin