What's better: dual-channel memory mode or a bit more RAM?
Adam Funk
a24061 at ducksburg.com
Sat Apr 30 20:15:17 UTC 2011
On 2011-04-30, Thibault Dupuis wrote:
> Le 30/04/2011 19:37, compdoc a écrit :
>>> Memory: 2047M 2126 MB/s
>>> [dual-channel]
This config is a matched pair of 512 MB in the blue slots and a
different matched pair of 512 MB (higher speed) in the black slots,
but the BIOS setup and lshw output show all four at the slower speed.
>>> Memory: 2559M 1103 MB/s
>>> [single-channel]
>>
>> That is a large difference, but it may be more due to mixing different sized
>> (and unmatched) dimms more than dual vs single channel. Go with that
>> dual-channel config.
OK, I guess that means I am interpreting the memtest86+ output
correctly; thanks.
>>> RAM: 159 MHz (DDR319)
>>
>> That's some old stuff you have there...
The computer is about 5 years old, but still works well enough for
its main purposes.
> Hum, Prefer Dual Channel.
That's what I was thinking.
Thanks to everyone for the advice!
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list