Restoring legacy components
Liam Proven
lproven at gmail.com
Sat Jan 29 19:44:00 UTC 2011
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Goh Lip <g.lip at gmx.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:36:45 +0800, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Although the only company to make KDE look attractive was Red Hat with
>> the Bluecurve theme. Same theme on GNOME and KDE - it looked great.
>> How come Ubuntu and Kubuntu can't coordinate like that?
>
>
> I still use the bluecurve and an older wallpaper with my newer kde's. Not
> that I care too much about appearances but just that I want my background
> crisp and clear, not fuzzy and woolly. I don't see the fuss about all this.
> If you don't like the theme , just change it. A young engineer loves his
> plasmoids, widgets and all that while a young mother has her desktop
> plastered with her kid's pictures. So, face it, we (we? trying to be polite
> here... :) ) are old, but that doesn't mean we should be frumpy and grumpy
> about how things should be.
>
> Heh heh , hope I don't hurt some feelings here. Just some good natured
> er.... ribbing.
Ha! Yes, definitely old now. I have spent some time trying to get a
couple of versions of Bluecurve to install & be usable on Ubuntu, but
I have always failed.
My greater question, though, you did not touch upon. How come Kubuntu,
as one of the main, dominant, officially-sanctioned remixes of Ubuntu,
does not have (a version of) the same themes as Ubuntu proper? Same
goes for Xubuntu, too.
--
Liam Proven • Info & profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/lproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AIM/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list