dist-upgrade: can unwanted "new" packages be prevented?

Ric Moore wayward4now at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 03:57:01 UTC 2012


On 07/26/2012 10:38 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> I started 'do-dist-upgrade' (oneiric to precise) and looked at the
> packages to be removed and added. It wants to add about 6X as many as it
> wants to remove. Many "new" packages are those I long ago removed in
> order to prevent wasting bandwidth during upgrades by not allowing
> packages that will absolutely never be used. Mostly that means
> non-western fonts and anything else related using or doing anything
> non-English, but I'm sure there would be others if I had a list of
> candidates to peruse beforehand.
>
> Pinning as described onhttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/PinningHowto
> doesn't seem designed to cover a situation like this. For one thing, I
> have no list of the packages to be prevented. The do-dist-upgrade
> command scattered packages apparently in random order all over the
> screen instead of offering a nice alphabetical list I could save or print.
>
> What do other English Ubuntu users do about this waste?

Suffer. I am on a Hughsnet Dish service and I'm chocked when I run over 
my daily allotment. I'd much rather the process be leaner and meaner. Ric


-- 
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
http://linuxcounter.net/user/44256.html






More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list