firefox, trackers and ghostery [SURELY THIS HAS HAD A DECENT RUN AND NOW SHOULD BE RETIRED]

[Patrick Asselman]

On 2013-07-20 06:05, Basil Chupin wrote:
> On 20/07/13 05:19, Ric Moore wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 10:23 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
>>> On 18/07/13 21:38, Basil Chupin wrote:
>>>> On 18/07/13 21:13, pete smout wrote:
>>>>> On 18/07/13 11:49, Patrick Asselman wrote:
>>>>>> On 2013-07-18 12:16, pete smout wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/07/13 11:09, Patrick Asselman wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2013-07-17 13:14, Sajan Parikh wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 07/17/2013 04:41 AM, pete smout wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...and I am writing that it is time to retire this exchange 
>>>> because it
>>>> does not go in any way in answering the OP's question.
>>>>
>>>> [rest savagely pruned and related to the waste bin]
>>>
>>> <Sigh>  'Relegated to...' of course.
>> It could be "related"" as well... <snirks> Ric
>
> As a distant cousin, of course :-) .
>

Only a few more of these replies and we will have had more content-less 
messages than actual discussion messages. As it should be, since it is 
the internet after all, and there is surely a law that says "non-content 
 > content". (If there is not, then I hereby postulate it.)

Best regards,
Patrick Asselman