Stop it already!
Basil Chupin
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Sat Nov 9 07:06:40 UTC 2013
On 09/11/13 17:01, Jared Norris wrote:
> On 9 November 2013 14:46, Robert Holtzman <holtzm at cox.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:27:06PM +0000, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> .......snip.......
>>> 3) debian-multimedia was forced to change to deb-multimedia by Debian
>>> (and Debian wasn't THAT happy about the new domain name because of the
>>> "deb") so it's unsurprising that Ubuntu/Canonical would react to
>>> fixubuntu's use of the Ubuntu logo and the fixubuntu name. The guy
>>> could've just put the same info on his own micahflee website but he
>>> has an anti-Ubuntu/Canonical agenda (and no understanding of the
>>> concept of live and let live). Ubuntu/Canonical have every right to
>>> defend themselves and their logo and name.
>> Not in this instance according to the EFF. I suspect they know a few
>> things about the law.
>>
>>> 4) The fixubuntu info's good (in 13.10, "gsettings set
>>> com.canonical.Unity.Lenses remote-content-search none" can be changed
>>> via the "security and privacy" applet) but "fix Ubuntu" is a misnomer
>>> and a misuse of "Ubuntu".
>> Where did you study law?
>>
>> --
>> Bob Holtzman
>> Your mail is being read by tight lipped
>> NSA agents who fail to see humor in Doctor
>> Strangelove
>> Key ID 8D549279
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-users mailing list
>> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>>
> Hello all,
>
> As previously mentioned, this mailing list is not the appropriate
> forum for this discussion. I (on behalf of the moderation team) have
> previously pointed out the correct place to do so and would invite
> people to move their conversation there. To my knowledge the Canonical
> legal team do not follow this mailing list so conversation on this
> list is not capable of resolving the issue at hand.
>
> If anyone has any technical questions about Ubuntu please start a new
> thread, any further posts to this thread will most likely result in
> further action against those users unable to comply. If you feel this
> is being handled incorrectly on this mailing list the correct response
> is to email the moderation team [1] rather than the list itself.
>
> [1] ubuntu-users-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
I have been watching the number of messages being posted in this list -
and the number has been declining at a very fast rate.
Years ago, when I first started in being interested in computers and
posting/reading messages (all this if Fidonet), I was told by an
experienced person that the lack of messages in any forum means a lack
of interest of the subject.
That is, nobody gives a rat's about it.
You start "moderating" people from this list, or even the other one
dealing with -ubuntu, you won't have anyone left to post or read this list.
And, in your profession, you should know what I am talking about.
BC
--
Using openSUSE 13.1, KDE 4.11.2 & kernel 3.12.0-1 on a system with-
AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor
16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair "Vengeance" RAM
Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX660 OC 2GB DDR5 GPU
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list