network admin, ip addresses for webserver
Thufir
hawat.thufir at gmail.com
Wed Oct 29 04:10:34 UTC 2014
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:54:05 +0000, Chris Green wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:58:00PM +0000, Colin Law wrote:
>> On 28 October 2014 19:06, Patrick Asselman <iceblink at seti.nl> wrote:
>> > On 2014-10-27 21:40, Colin Law wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 27 October 2014 20:35, Thufir <hawat.thufir at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Why is important for a server to use static ip address instead of
>> >>> DHCP?
>> >>> If it's behind a router, why not use that router's outward facing
>> >>> IP address, and then the router will *route* to that hostname?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Many (most?) routers require an IP address to be specified when
>> >> setting up port forwarding, so the server needs a fixed ip address.
>> >> Can your router take a host name instead?
>> >>
>> >>
>> > My router allows one to set a preferred ip address for a particular
>> > computer (or rather: mac address).
>> > That way you can use port forwarding on the router as well as use
>> > DHCP on the server.
>>
>> Is that not just a different way of assigning a fixed ip address to the
>> PC?
>>
> Yes, but it means you don't have to reconfigure the PC to give itself a
> static address. You leave the PC configuration exactly as it was
> picking up whatever the router gives it (plus the DNS, gateway and
> default route), much simpler in many ways.
To ballpark, what are the performance differences between allowing the PC
to use DHCP and have router assign a preferred ip address, versus an
actual static ip address?
This is for internal use only.
Thanks,
Thufir
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list