Why do all the sudo? [was Re: Software updater no longer functional]
Tony Arnold
tony.arnold at manchester.ac.uk
Sun Jan 22 16:47:05 UTC 2017
Chris,
On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 12:37 +0000, Chris Green wrote:
> This is a classic case where I wonder why not change:-
>
> >
> > Next steps:
> >
> > sudo apt-get install -f
> >
> > -- fixes any package errors
> >
> > NOTE THEM DOWN if it doesn't work & tell us
> >
> > sudo apt-get clean
> >
> > -- empty the package cache
> >
> > sudo apt-get autoremove -y
> >
> > -- remove obsoleted packages & ones nothing else use
> >
> > sudo touch /forcefsck
> > sudo shutdown -r now
> >
>
> to:-
>
> >
> > Next steps:
> >
> > sudo -i
> > apt-get install -f
> >
> > -- fixes any package errors
> >
> > NOTE THEM DOWN if it doesn't work & tell us
> >
> > apt-get clean
> >
> > -- empty the package cache
> >
> > apt-get autoremove -y
> >
> > -- remove obsoleted packages & ones nothing else use
> >
> > touch /forcefsck
> > shutdown -r now
> >
>
> It saves typing! :-)
>
> This is by no means the worst case, you often see great streams of
> 'sudo this' and 'sudo that' in descriptions of how to do things.
>
Yep! Couldn't agree more. I use 'sudo -i' a lot! But it's rarely
suggested in any advice or documentation I've seen.
Regards,
Tony.
--
Tony Arnold MBCS, CITP | Senior IT Security Analyst | Directorate of IT Services | G64, Kilburn Building | The University of Manchester | Manchester M13 9PL | T: +44 161 275 6093 | M: +44 773 330 0039
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list