Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

[aconcernedfossdev at airmail.cc]

Nice to know you view legal matters as "crap".

What does that make those who work in the legal field, oh queen?

On 2017-06-15 17:04, W Stacy Lockwood wrote:
> Take this crap to LKML where ALL the kernel developers who matter,
> are.
> 
> --
> W. Stacy Lockwood
> 
> stacy at guppylog.com
> 
> (847) 579-9753
> 
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, <aconcernedfossdev at airmail.cc>
> wrote:
> 
>> Because some of you on this list may very well be linux kernel
>> contributors and this is a fairly new development (month old) of a
>> developing issue (1 year old). It's crossed the Rubicon now though
>> and it's time for a joint filing. It is time to _SUE_.
>> 
>> On 2017-06-15 16:45, Tom H wrote:
>> Why should we care?
>> 
>> And more importantly, why should we care within the context of
>> ubuntu-users@?!
>> 
>> Please take this elsewhere.
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM,  <aconcernedfossdev at airmail.cc>
>> wrote:
>> Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly
>> violating
>> the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
>> He is also violating the license grant, Courts would not be fooled
>> by his
>> scheme to prevent redistribution.
>> 
>> The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed under disallows
>> the
>> imposition of additional terms. The making of an understanding that
>> the
>> derivative work must not be redistributed (lest there be
>> retaliation) is the
>> imposition of an additional term. The communication of this threat
>> is the
>> moment that GRSecurity violates the license grant. Thence-forth
>> modification, making of derivative works, and distribution of such
>> is a
>> violation of the Copyright statute. The concoction of the
>> transparent scheme
>> shows that it is a willful violation, one taken in full knowledge by
>> GRSecurity of the intention of the original grantor.
>> 
>> Why does not one person here care?
>> Just want to forget what holds Libre Software together and go the
>> way of
>> BSD?
>> 
>> (Note: last month the GRSecurity Team removed the public testing
>> patch,
>> they prevent the distribution of the patch by paying customers by a
>> threat of no further business: they have concocted a transparent
>> scheme
>> to make sure the intention of the Linux rights-holders (thousands of
>> entities) are defeated) (This is unlike RedHat who do distribute
>> their
>> patches in the form the rights-holders prefer: source code, RedHat
>> does
>> not attempt to stymie the redistribution of their derivative works,
>> GRSecurity does.).
>> 
>> ------
>> ( This song is about GRSecurity's violation of Linus et al's
>> copyright**:
>> youtube.com/watch?v=CYnhI3wUej8 [1]
>> (A Boat Sails Away 2016 17) )
>> 
>> --
>> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
>> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss [2]
> 
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users [3]
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://youtube.com/watch?v=CYnhI3wUej8
> [2] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
> [3] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users