out of space on /root
Xen
list at xenhideout.nl
Mon Mar 13 15:02:22 UTC 2017
Liam Proven schreef op 13-03-2017 15:00:
> On 13 March 2017 at 14:54, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote:
>> I like stuff to be WYSIWYG and you would never print anything with
>> absolutely zero borders.
>
> No, I wouldn't, but I don't work in WYSIWYG mode all the time. On my
> Kindle, on my iPad, I resize e-books for minimal border size. It's a
> waste of pixels to me.
Well that's a different topic isn't it. An iPad as a border of its own
(a physical border) that you don't really care about.
>> I even have an issue when some text editor displays text in a
>> sans-serif
>> font and the result page would be serif. It just changes the aspect of
>> what
>> I can expect when writing something. Some editors even fail to
>> properly do
>> italic text, I believe, while the resulting text does have it, or
>> proper
>> indents, I don't know (Drupal).
>
> It's a text editor. I'm writing text. Plain text. No formatting. What
> it looks like is irrelevant as long as it is legible. I generally
> avoid using fonts, bold and italic in writing anyway. If I do need
> them, I often use Markdown-style ASCII marku: *this* is bold, /this/
> is italic and _this_
> denotes underline.
I don't know why you are comparing yourself to me :p.
I was talking about stuff that *does* get published. And to that other
person (David Fletcher), I do not only write source code in text
editors, they can be used for other things as well. A Word Processor is
often a too bloated environment for simple things and you like something
in between, or at least something that is reasonably usable for regular
text as well.
That said of course I do not need markup in a regular text editor,
that's the whole point of these things (although WordPad is nice, and
*should* be a nice in-between) but a regular text editor still has *for
me* to not distract me from the code/text by having an imposing text
frame and or border display that draws more attention than the text you
are looking at. It is just graphical design principles from my point of
view.
For example, in my current email writer (roundcube) I do not have the
issue even though it also has a thin distance but the border is not
imposing, as well as that the edge does not fall away and instantly show
the desktop, so the desktop (or other windows) is also not interfering
with the display of the text.
I just don't want to be distracted, that's all, and with these
thin-border editors your text is met side-by-side with whatever
irrelevance might be going on in the background.
Try to focus on your text when a girl is staring at you from just around
the edge of your monitor, with one eye, for example :p.
So the roundcube editor not only has a non-imposing border that does not
draw attention, it also has a swath of white sitting next to it, being
non-distracting.
http://www.xen.dds.nl/f/i/screenshots/roundcube-edit-window1.png
To me, that's just very pleasant and I'm never distracted by it.
"All that is required is clarity on the screen"
That is what I was speaking of.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list