Slightly OT? WiFi problems

Liam Proven lproven at gmail.com
Thu Feb 10 11:03:24 UTC 2022


On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 21:35, Colin Law <clanlaw at gmail.com> wrote:

> How can you have a mesh consisting of one router?  I thought the whole
> point was that you have multiple access points working seamlessly
> together.

I was going to say the same.

1 router is not a mesh. It's a bog-standard normal WLAN AP.

2 routers is not a mesh. It's an AP + a repeater.

3 is a minimal mesh but with almost no redundant paths and will not
give much better results than one. It's a flip-flop: there are 2
possible paths for the signal.

4 has some chance of working better than fewer.

5+ is a true mesh, where the signal can take various paths and be
rerouted on the fly for roaming access, where clients can hop from one
AP to another and remain connected.

-- 
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
UK: (+44) 7939-087884 ~ Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list