[Bug 310088] Re: restore-trash crashes if the original path does not exist (even if it's in the same trash can)

[Christoph Bloch]

One more suggestion: Don't name the trash command "trash-file" unless there are absolutely compulsory reasons for it. My arguments against "trash-file": 
* It is not intuitive and therefore unnecessarily difficult to memorise. 
* It is unnecessarily long. 
* Every change in the name of programs causes confusion, so the new solution should be a clear improvement (which it isn't).
* It is even wrong: Directories can be trashed, too. 

Just "trash" was much better.

However, I welcome the renaming of "restore-trash" to "trash-restore",
"list-trash" to "trash-list" etc. This is intuitive and allows the user
to look for the appropriate command with the tab key.

-- 
restore-trash crashes if the original path does not exist (even if it's in the same trash can)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310088
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs