[Bug 193818] Re: Please update to latest 0.6

[Philipp Kern]

I agree that it's a long-term plan to have libgnomescan available.  In
its current form I'd rather not have it, though, especially if you don't
intend to bump SONAMEs on ABI changes.  Especially I cannot put this new
library into libgnomescan0 and the package naming is generally derived
from the SONAME.

So I think we should have at max two real packages (which increase the
value of gnomescan as it was in Ubuntu before): flegita and maybe
flegita-gimp.  I'm not sure if we really need a second package for the
latter, especially if we integrate libgnomescan with its translations
into flegita.

The other question is if we want to migrate from gnomescan to flegita,
or from gnomescan to gnome-scan depending on flegita (or flegita and
flegita-gimp if we decide to keep both).

But I guess that you agree that we should find an acceptable solution
soon to make it into Karmic, right?  So we can reintroduce the library
(not with the name libgnomescan0, though) in a later release anyway.

-- 
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs