[Bug 355781] Re: [Source+binary removal] kdvi

[Vincenzo Ciancia]

The last sentence is neither correct nor complete. It should read:

"In that case, I would prefer using evince because it reloads documents
much faster (and it matters in the specific case of latex). Of course,
installing _kdvi_ from intrepid ..."

BTW: as usual, don't get me wrong. E.g. okular is a good tool because it
allows for pdf annotations. In a scientific environment this is useful
for reviewing papers and I don't have doubts that people will like it  a
lot. It is the specific use case of frequent document recompiling that
makes it the wrong tool in the jaunty (and possibly karmic) time window.
I do not have any doubt that it will replace kdvi completely in the
future.

-- 
[Source+binary removal] kdvi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355781
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs