[Bug 450874] Re: Consider releasing Karmic with nginx 0.7.62 vs patched 0.7.61

[Daniel Hahler]

nginx is "only" a suggests for thin1.8, puppetmaster and chef-server.
While I have not tested them, I do not believe that it would cause any regression, since they use nginx only as webserver (AFAICS). Would you consider testing all apache2 rdepends, when there's a bugfix release for it?

Scott, I don't think it needs a FFe, since there's only one new minor feature in nginx (discussed above), apart from the things changed in Debian:
 nginx  (0.7.62-3) unstable; urgency=low

   * debian/rules: fix the FTBFS on sparc.

 -- Fabio Tranchitella <kobold at debian.org>  Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:39:22 +0000
nginx (0.7.62-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * debian/rules: added --with-mail and --with-mail_ssl_module.
   * debian/patches/nginx-upstream-fair.dpatch: added support for the
     nginx-upstream-fair module. (Closes: #521447)
   * debian/patches/dlopen.dpatch: applied patch to remove the unnecesssary link
     to libdl. (Closes: #540599)

 -- Fabio Tranchitella <kobold at debian.org>  Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:32:00 +0000
nginx (0.7.62-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * New upstream release.
   * debian/rules: added --with-ipv6. (Closes: #547249)


However, the default config appears to be broken: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551682 - this should get resolved before uploading this again. This was added in 0.7.62-2 probably (not included in the debdiff above).

The package is available in my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~blueyed/+archive/ppa

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #551682
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551682

-- 
Consider releasing Karmic with nginx 0.7.62 vs patched 0.7.61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs