[Bug 427833] [NEW] [MIR] gnome-web-photo
Loïc Minier
lool at dooz.org
Fri Sep 11 12:12:13 UTC 2009
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-web-photo
Hi
Availability
available on all arches
Rationale:
netbook-launcher, the UNR full screen application launcher, allows user
to maintain web favourites / bookmarks in the launcher; they are added
by drag-n-drop on an applet (go-home-applet). This package would allow
generating thumbnails for web favourites added in this way. There is a
short overview and discussion of the features (or missing features) in
bug #425464.
Security:
CVE entries
Secunia history
None; this is using xulrunner though and is expected to be impacted by
the same issues as xulrunner/firefox but the issues will be fixed in
xulrunner as usual.
* Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ? Any daemons ?
None
* Network activity: does it open any port ? Does it handle incoming network data ?
* Does it directly (not through a library) process binary (video, audio, etc) or structured (PDF, etc) data ?
Absolutely; it processes web pages to output a screenshot. This is
using xulrunner so it's probably as vulnerable/secure as firefox in
Ubuntu.
* Any source code review performed ? (The approver will do a
quick and shallow check.)
Just a quick check done, not a real security review
Quality assurance:
* In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ?
None
* Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than
priority 'medium' ?
No debconf-age
Debian bugs: (mention any that are particularly relevant, and any showstoppers)
Maintenance in Debian is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ?
while there is an interested Debian person working on the package, it's apparently not in Debian
Upstream is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ?
calm, development seems to be mostly complete; last release in June 2009
so decently recent.
Upstream bug tracker: (mention any particularly relevant or
critical)
*cough* none found; I think it's relatively low volume. ChangeLog
mentions some Novell bugzilla bugs have been resolved. The upstream
maintainer, chpe, is a GNOME figure and probably can be easily contacted
to escalate issues.
DOAP file says:
<bug-database rdf:resource="mailto:epiphany-list%40gnome.org" />
* Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ?
No
* Is there a test suite in the upstream source or packaging ?
Is it enabled to run in the build ?
No
UI standards:
* User-visible strings are internationalized using standard gettext system ?
Yes
* Package with translatable strings builds a PO template
during package build ?
Yes (CDBS gnome.mk)
* End-user applications ship a desktop file ?
No
Standards compliance:
FHS, Debian Policy compliance ?
Yes
* Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ? Patch system ? Any
packaging oddities ?
CDBS + simple-patchsys; nothing fancy
Dependencies:
* Are these all in main ?
Yes
Maintenance:
* How much maintenance is this package likely to need ? (Simple packages may largely take care of themselves; complex packages will need dedicated developers paying attention to them.)
Very little; perhaps triaging some xulrunner crashes from time to time
* Who is responsible for monitoring the quality of this
package and fixing its bugs ? Are they Ubuntu or Debian developers ?
Couple of universe contributors and now the UNR Developers team; the
Ubuntu UNR team might also assist.
* Who is the package bug contact in Ubuntu? (Needs one if its
a nontrivial package which does not fully maintain itself through
Debian)
None; UNR developers are sub-ed to bugmail
Background information:
* The general purpose and context of the package should be clear from the package's debian/control file. If it isn't then please explain.
See top description: taking screenshots of bookmarked web sites for UNR.
* What do upstream call this software ? Has it had different
names in the past ?
No, just gnome-web-photo
Internationalization:
* Are graphical applications translatable? Do they support gettext?
Yes
There's a warning during build with ignoring the return code of nice which I think is harmless.
I'm unhappy with the wrapper script, see bug #427817, asac might help us
get this resolved.
Bug #425464 mentions other imperfections but IMHO nothing serious.
** Affects: gnome-web-photo (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac)
Status: New
--
[MIR] gnome-web-photo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427833
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
More information about the universe-bugs
mailing list