Upstart 1.0 development branch
Casey Dahlin
cdahlin at redhat.com
Thu Apr 30 21:25:28 BST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Oh gosh. No offense intended, but I much prefer the producingoss text
> over the two blogs in question. The former is a cohesive and
> well-reasoned rhetoric for entire-process openness, while the latter two
> are more passive-aggressive and whiny.
>
One of them was my blog :)
> Like it or not, this *is* open source software, meaning that however the
> primary developers want to do it is how it will be done. Whining
But its /not/ open source. Not right now anyway. The source is closed,
hence the thread.
> doesn't help, and, in fact, usually hinders the process. Open source is
> as much about the community as it is the final product.
>
Understand the circumstances here. Aside from myself and Scott there is,
to my knowledge, one other person with code upstream. This isn't a
typical case of "community." Part of that is due to problems like this.
- --CJD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkn6CTgACgkQIHOkVH4pLz7+fACcChzIRLRd82Zr4yaXolpEjvwh
LFYAn0pXXa5HFJ+FaE55NeWvYImrAmHe
=IKGx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the upstart-devel
mailing list