RFC: bzr rm is hard to use

[Ewan Milne]

> It also looks to me if option 1 is winning and is closer to what we
> have now, but not everybody agrees.
> In the end there can be only one default, so we have to choose.

I might be misreading the thread, but it seems to me that option 2 has
more support?

Perhaps this is my interpretation because it is the option I favour
;-) It seems very important to me to have symmetry between add and
remove, so that by default bzr rm should not remove the file from the
filesystem. As demonstrated by Ian:

>  bzr add foo
>  (damn, didn't mean that)
>  bzr rm foo