ubuntu-image 0.7ubuntu1

Steve Langasek steve.langasek at canonical.com
Fri Oct 14 16:08:20 UTC 2016


On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:19:28AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:

> >>given that xenial has the wrong e2fslibs, should we not refrain from
> >>having a deb at all and just point people to the snap instead, that
> >>will make sure that the right snapd and the right e2fslibs are always
> >>available to the tool.  

> >We have a code path that works on Xenial.  It just requires sudo though.

> I misremembered; we never released it to Xenial so we don't need to do that
> now.  However, the code path is still useful for people running it from source
> on the LTS.

We will also be consuming ubuntu-image internally as a .deb on top of 16.04,
for image auto-builds in Launchpad.  So we will want this in the archive
regardless.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.snapcraft.io/archives/devices/attachments/20161014/f32b3572/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Devices mailing list