ubuntu-image 0.7ubuntu1

[Oliver Grawert]

hi,
On Fr, 2016-10-14 at 09:08 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:19:28AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > given that xenial has the wrong e2fslibs, should we not refrain
> > > > from
> > > > having a deb at all and just point people to the snap instead,
> > > > that
> > > > will make sure that the right snapd and the right e2fslibs are
> > > > always
> > > > available to the tool.  
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > We have a code path that works on Xenial.  It just requires sudo
> > > though.
> 
> > 
> > I misremembered; we never released it to Xenial so we don't need to
> > do that
> > now.  However, the code path is still useful for people running it
> > from source
> > on the LTS.
> 
> We will also be consuming ubuntu-image internally as a .deb on top of
> 16.04,
> for image auto-builds in Launchpad.  So we will want this in the
> archive
> regardless.
> 
aha, does that mean you will backport e2fslibs to xenial 
as proper SRU ? 

ciao
	oli
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.snapcraft.io/archives/devices/attachments/20161014/19b055ea/attachment.pgp>