[Review Queue] multiple IBM designs

[Kevin Monroe]

Hi folks, the IBM Charmers have adjusted several of their in-flight designs
to use Juju 2.0 features (specifically, Terms and Resources).  Matt and I
took a look at the following:

- IBM Installation Manager :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qBzMO_Zgy35ty6NCBfdI5Utn7B4I4sTX3_FtPs3UndY/pub
- IBM HTTP Server :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PQjZofa9aK4s9m2yKcvMkqsLT_esgZ2iJVf-DnVdNEU/pub
- IBM WAS Base :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O7J_SLDdCD-D7J8xG7k_9hAGTo8j7BcfCXbA3iTtkR8/pub
- IBM Platform LSF :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f0UxATIym7v1rq6qFqTA6Lhpp2ABpBTl5BiU1LgVW4A/pub
- IBM Platform Symphony :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gDH4YkNh3xV2UAkUx9cq4MndFdS3DYrs3Pdiu-8Bf_c/edit
- IBM Spectrum Scale :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15VPxSNZWnEZTDbxdpne5IHiDpyVhK29d3kQ5uZ5oPaA/edit?usp=sharing
- IBM WAS ND :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Uh_EghiBKZiDf8ZiM6T-VQzVfoTj4gOlwTl9oieBwc/pub
We made a few comments/suggestions, but overall, these look good and have a
+1 from us to implement.

As a reminder, we like reviewing designs just as much as "normal" charm
reviews.  I think we can all agree that the earlier we catch potential
pitfalls, the better.  Big props to IBM for requesting feedback so early in
their charm development cycle.

If you have notes on a napkin, a google doc, a gist, or a charming idea
floating between your head and the keyboard, put into a medium we can
digest and we'll take a look!

Thanks,
-Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160706/0580eb9d/attachment.html>