[Review Queue] multiple IBM designs

[Mark Shuttleworth]

Yes, it's great to see this shift towards up-front professional design
for charms. The new reactive framework has really made it essential to
think of charms as full-blown open source code with reusable aspects
that are shared across the ops community.

Mark

On 06/07/16 15:22, Kevin Monroe wrote:
> Hi folks, the IBM Charmers have adjusted several of their in-flight
> designs to use Juju 2.0 features (specifically, Terms and Resources). 
> Matt and I took a look at the following:
>
> # IBM Installation Manager
> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qBzMO_Zgy35ty6NCBfdI5Utn7B4I4sTX3_FtPs3UndY/pub
>
> # IBM HTTP Server
> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PQjZofa9aK4s9m2yKcvMkqsLT_esgZ2iJVf-DnVdNEU/pub
>
> # IBM WAS Base
> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O7J_SLDdCD-D7J8xG7k_9hAGTo8j7BcfCXbA3iTtkR8/pub
>
> # IBM Platform LSF
> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f0UxATIym7v1rq6qFqTA6Lhpp2ABpBTl5BiU1LgVW4A/pub
>
> # IBM Platform Symphony
> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gDH4YkNh3xV2UAkUx9cq4MndFdS3DYrs3Pdiu-8Bf_c/edit
>
> # IBM Spectrum Scale
> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/15VPxSNZWnEZTDbxdpne5IHiDpyVhK29d3kQ5uZ5oPaA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> # IBM WAS ND
> : https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Uh_EghiBKZiDf8ZiM6T-VQzVfoTj4gOlwTl9oieBwc/pub
>
> We made a few comments/suggestions, but overall, these look good and
> have a +1 from us to implement.
>
> As a reminder, we like reviewing designs just as much as "normal"
> charm reviews.  I think we can all agree that the earlier we catch
> potential pitfalls, the better.  Big props to IBM for requesting
> feedback so early in their charm development cycle.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160706/6477772d/attachment.html>