Deprecating this ML for development discussion

[Billy Olsen]

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Felipe Reyes
<felipe.reyes at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:07:43 +0000 James Page <james.page at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > We still need to figure out where general end-user questions need to
> > be targeted to - I suspect that this is probably
> > openstack at lists.openstack.org but need to confirm.
>
> Due to the nature of the charms and the intended audience, I think a
> better place is the operators mailing list
> ( openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org ), in that ML is very common
> to see discussions around puppet or similar solutions.

I think both lists are valid openstack@ and openstack-operators@,
depending on the end-user.

I would expect more experienced/seasoned users/operators should likely
post in openstack-operators@ whereas novices and people first
exploring will post in openstack at . This is along the same lines as the
guidelines given for choosing a mailing list -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists

>
>
> Best,
> --
> Felipe Reyes
> Software Sustaining Engineer @ Canonical
> STS Engineering Team
> # Email: felipe.reyes at canonical.com (GPG:0x9B1FFF39)
> # Launchpad: ~freyes | IRC: freyes
>
> --
> Openstack-charmers mailing list
> Openstack-charmers at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/openstack-charmers




-- 
Billy Olsen

billy.olsen at canonical.com
Software Engineer
Canonical USA