Deprecating this ML for development discussion

[James Page]

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 at 22:48 Billy Olsen <billy.olsen at canonical.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Felipe Reyes
> <felipe.reyes at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:07:43 +0000 James Page <james.page at ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > We still need to figure out where general end-user questions need to
> > > be targeted to - I suspect that this is probably
> > > openstack at lists.openstack.org but need to confirm.
> >
> > Due to the nature of the charms and the intended audience, I think a
> > better place is the operators mailing list
> > ( openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org ), in that ML is very common
> > to see discussions around puppet or similar solutions.
>
> I think both lists are valid openstack@ and openstack-operators@,
> depending on the end-user.
>
> I would expect more experienced/seasoned users/operators should likely
> post in openstack-operators@ whereas novices and people first
> exploring will post in openstack at . This is along the same lines as the
> guidelines given for choosing a mailing list -
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists


+1 sounds like a plan; I'll be adding information to all README's for
end-users and introducing a new HACKING.md for developers including
communication methods.

We should also be setting up an #openstack-charms IRC channel on freenode
soon.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/openstack-charmers/attachments/20160609/344a1d00/attachment.html>