Package too old for cleanbuild

[Kyle Fazzari]

On 02/09/2017 12:02 PM, Alan Pope wrote:
> Hi Kyle (and Sergio!)
> 
> On 9 February 2017 at 18:45, Kyle Fazzari <kyle.fazzari at canonical.com> wrote:
>> If you find yourself using cleanbuild a lot (it makes a new ephemeral
>> container, builds, then destroys the container), you might find some
>> workflow improvements by simply developing the snap in a container. You
>> can even bind-mount the source from the host, if you want. This is the
>> workflow I use personally. It allows for one to fully customize the apt
>> sources while also utilizing Snapcraft's built-in stage package cache*,
>> and it doesn't clutter the development environment on the host.
>>
>> * In snapcraft 2.27, coming early next week
>>
> 
> You guys! I love reading these teases of what's coming in the next
> snapcraft. Your fast iterating and understanding of user requirements
> is making snapcraft a real pleasurable tool to use on a daily basis.
> Thank you!

Well thanks Alan! That's nice to hear :) .

-- 
Kyle Fazzari (kyrofa)
Software Engineer
Canonical Ltd.
kyle at canonical.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20170209/33321fe4/attachment.sig>