Fortune magazine article needs more info to be informative.

[David Allouche]

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 14:20 -0500, J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote:
> The blame for this article should be placed squarely on Fortune magazine. 
> This article raises more questions than it answers, and none of those 
> questions make Fortune look like they know what they're talking about.

In the light of another article in the same dept.

http://www.forbes.com/technology/infrastructure/2005/06/15/jboss-ibm-linux_cz_dl_0615jboss.html

it appears that Verisign is "sponsoring" Forbes (and probably Daniel
Lyons, editor of both articles) in an aggressive FUD campain against
free software and Linux.

-- 
                                                            -- ddaa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20050618/f88de217/attachment.pgp