multimedia software

On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 01:31:27PM -0800, Daniel Robitaille wrote:
> > Hrm, sometimes during last month I wonder how many people
> > writing from @ubuntu.com or @canonical.com addresses here are
> > really understanding the matter they're discussing.
> > Not to think that's wrong (lots of things are complicated and
> > multi-faceted) but... funny.  Still maybe those are folks
> > doing different jobs and kind of getting acquainted with the
> > situation?
> well, anyone who is an Ubuntu member [1] can have a @ubuntu.com
> email address.

Hm, a bit confusing to me given that voluntary teams tend to
flock around dot-orgs.  Maybe even not me alone...

> For a concrete example, I could write all day long about Java
> licenses with my @ubuntu.com email address, but it doesn't mean
> I know anything about the topic (I don't),  have any form of
> influence on the decision-making process about it at Canonical,
> nor what I would write implies any kind of official position
> from Ubuntu/Canonical (It doesn't).

Sure, I could even write with e.g. your address, too.
Technically speaking, that is. :)

> [1]   http://www.ubuntulinux.org/community/processes/newmember

Thanks, quite interesting (and to compare).

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike at altlinux.ru>
  ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/