Licensing

[Corey Burger]

On 11/7/06, Bhuvaneswaran <bhuvan at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > After our discussion from a couple of months back, and discussion in the
> > meeting, we resolved to move the license to a single CC-By-SA license.
> > I'd like to move this on and start getting it implemented.
> >
> > What do people think about the best way to go ahead with this?
>
> It's a very good decision. When we decide to make this change in all
> our documents, i think we should also consider to move to latest
> CC-By-SA 2.5 license from 2.0 license.
>
> I'm not very clear about the difference between them. But from very
> first look, i see they have re-organized the restrictions section 4b.
>
> [1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcode
> [2] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode

Actually, we already distributing them under the latest version of the
CC, as per the legal code:
You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this
License, a later version of this License with the same License
Elements as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that
contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g.
Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Japan).

note the bit about the later license.

Corey