Licensing [sec=unclassified]

[Stoffers, Robert LAC]

> >
> > [1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcode
> > [2] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode

> Actually, we already distributing them under the latest version of the
CC, 
> as per the legal code: You may distribute, publicly display, publicly
perform,
> or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms
of this 
> License, a later version of this License with the same License
Elements as 
> this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the
same
> License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5
Japan).

Couldn't the documentation team just "fork" the documentation under the
CC license without obtaining approval from it's copyright owners first
just like anyone else can? Is there a requirement for anyone else who
wants to use the documentation to distribute it under the terms of both
licenses or can they just pick one?

Robert Stoffers