Format for procedures

[Matthew East]

Whoops, sent this just to Ralph rather than to the whole list. Sorry Ralph.

> I would like to suggest a change to the format of procedural
> instructions.  I realize that this change will make for more changes,
> but it benefits the user in two ways.  One, it allows the Table of
> Contents to have a high level of granularity for faster access.  Two, it
> gives the uses "checkpoints" to know where they are in the process.

As far as I can see you've basically applied our general method for
procedures to a passage that was missing it. It's definitely an
improvement: please feel free to open a bug on that passage or submit a
patch. We use the <procedure> tag for procedures. Check any other
procedure section for a quick example of how to use that tag.

Matt