Fwd: Editing !ops to clarify its usage

[Lorenzo J. Lucchini]

On Tuesday 30 October 2007 12:45:17 Joseph Price wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 01:27 +0000, Andrew Barber wrote:
> > That is a great idea, another thing that would be cool is a reason. !
> > ops <reason> and that is posted to #ubuntu-ops. So instead of just
> > <nick> called the ops in <channel>  it could say  <nick> called the
> > ops in <channel> due to <reason>
>
> My supybot foo is low but... wouldn't that would require more than just
> the factoid we use for ops right now... it'd be a separate function
> (kind of like @larts) and would make editing the list of ops on it much
> more difficult.
>
> Yeah it could be nice... but when someone calls ops its usually only 5
> seconds of scanning of the scrollback before you realise why as the
> offending user has already been warned etc.

Many people already use !ops | <nickname/reason> to that effect. The only 
caveat is that the reason isn't currently reported to #ubuntu-ops.

by LjL
ljlbox at tiscali.it
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20071030/64da9035/attachment.pgp>