status of ubuntu-nordic.org

[Andreas Olsson]

On sön, 2013-12-01 at 12:59 +0200, Pasi Lallinaho wrote:
> On 01/12/13 12:48, Søren Bredlund Caspersen wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Pasi Lallinaho <pasi at shimmerproject.org> wrote:
> >> If we don't mind the additional burden it takes to get files on the host
> >> updated via the Canonical IS, I would think them maintaining the domain
> >> and the hosting would be the best option, since then we wouldn't need to
> >> rely on any team financially (there are better ways to use that money).
> >>
> >> I can send a request on the IS requst tracker and follow up on it if you
> >> think this is a viable option.
> > If you know who to contact and how to make it happen, I'm all for it!
> 
> What do others think of this? If no objections arise in the following
> days, I will assume it's OK for everyone and go ahead.

Having Canonical manage the domain sounds good to me. If nothing else
because that lessens the risk of the domain accidentally expiring.

When it comes to web hosting I don't have much of an opinion either way.

Yet, let us wait a few more days before sending any request, and give
others a bit more time to potentially object. After all, not everyone
have the good sense to read their e-mail all the time.

// Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-nordic/attachments/20131201/79ac72ec/attachment.pgp>