status of ubuntu-nordic.org

[Tm_T]

On 1 December 2013 14:02, Andreas Olsson <andreas at arrakis.se> wrote:
> On sön, 2013-12-01 at 12:59 +0200, Pasi Lallinaho wrote:
>> On 01/12/13 12:48, Søren Bredlund Caspersen wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Pasi Lallinaho <pasi at shimmerproject.org> wrote:
>> >> If we don't mind the additional burden it takes to get files on the host
>> >> updated via the Canonical IS, I would think them maintaining the domain
>> >> and the hosting would be the best option, since then we wouldn't need to
>> >> rely on any team financially (there are better ways to use that money).
>> >>
>> >> I can send a request on the IS requst tracker and follow up on it if you
>> >> think this is a viable option.
>> > If you know who to contact and how to make it happen, I'm all for it!
>>
>> What do others think of this? If no objections arise in the following
>> days, I will assume it's OK for everyone and go ahead.
>
> Having Canonical manage the domain sounds good to me. If nothing else
> because that lessens the risk of the domain accidentally expiring.
>
> When it comes to web hosting I don't have much of an opinion either way.
>
> Yet, let us wait a few more days before sending any request, and give
> others a bit more time to potentially object. After all, not everyone
> have the good sense to read their e-mail all the time.
>
> // Andreas
>
> --
> Ubuntu-nordic mailing list
> Ubuntu-nordic at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-nordic
>

+1 from me, let's just get it done (:

-- 
Tm_T, Jussi Kekkonen
  Ubuntu/KDE developer  tmt at ubuntu.com