Server comments

[Jim Bodkikns (Dakotacom)]

   As I mentioned, it isnt so much for me, it is for installs in California 
(I"m in Arizona) for people that I trust as responsible people but who dont 
have my background. They can admin many things and save me lots of time and 
trouble, but not without a desktop.

   Omit the desktop apps (open office etc) . They can be added if needed 
(shared app environment - ltsp).

   Helping those that perform a function themselves rather than calling me, 
helps me. :)


   Keep the appliance install though. That clearly is needed as well.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ingo Lantschner" <ingo.lists at vum.at>
To: <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Server comments


> Jim Bodkikns (Dakotacom) schrieb:
>
>>   My real problem is with the server install. Come on guys. Are you 
>> serious? What you call a server install, stopped being useful ten years 
>> ago. Contemporary servers require desktops and more.
> The last thing I need on a server is a GUI or even worse a "Desktop". But 
> this seems to be a question of taste and habits ...
>
> Just for everyones information: There is a server-version of Ubuntu also. 
> How it differs from the standard Ubuntu can be read here:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerFaq
>
> Cheers, Ingo.
>
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users