Let's kill "sideloading"

[Victor Palau]

Hi,

In the case of installing snaps from the local file system, where will the
assertions require to installation reside? Also in the local file system?

I can see this use case when either the snap is not yet in the store
(during development) or the device has no access to the/a store (maybe
behind a firewall)

Thanks

Victor

Thanks

Victor

On Sep 2, 2016 8:08 AM, "Oliver Grawert" <ogra at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> hi,
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.09.2016, 19:15 -0300 schrieb Gustavo Niemeyer:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > With assertions finally being put to great use, it's time to kill the
> > term "sideloading". That term does a disservice to our conversations,
> > because it is vague and also limits the thinking around what is
> > possible.
> >
> > Whenever we use "sideloading", we mean one of two things:
> >
> does it actually matter what *we* use ? its the slang of the android
> kids, it is what they know and will use when talking about the topic of
> installing local packages, no matter what we say in our marketing docs
> ...
>
> i dont mind changing it in docs or watching my personal language to not
> use it if we decide on a term, but i doubt the crowd will follow if you
> dont find a term that feels like a natural replacement for them...
>
> ciao
>         oli
>
>
> --
> Snapcraft mailing list
> Snapcraft at lists.snapcraft.io
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20160902/e38946ac/attachment.html>